Google has released its new creation Antigravity and now developers are wondering if this is the tool that will finally make them unemployed or just a little more efficient. Either way, there are actually good arguments that Antigravity could be a better alternative than VS Code. Time to dissect all of this before the agents do it for us.
VS Code is a fantastic tool but it’s also a bit like working in a toolbox where all the drawers are open and you don’t remember why. Google Antigravity, on the other hand, puts AI at the center and changes the conditions for how a project can be managed. The difference is not just cosmetic but very structural.
A short version
The most interesting thing is how Google has built a whole system for AI agents that can work simultaneously. Even here it differs significantly from VS Code, which relies more on plugins that try to assist between keystrokes.
A developer described it this way
“It feels like going from cooking by yourself to having an army of chefs who don’t sleep. Or understand human emotions. But they deliver.”
This kind of flow creates a different role for the developer. You direct, prioritize and supervise. The agents build, test and structure.
VS Code lets you write code quickly. Antigravity lets you write code whenever you want and lets AI take care of the rest so you have time left for other things. Like staring into space or trying to answer Slack messages.
The benefits become clear
It is not just more features, it is a new way to think about productivity.
VS Code is safe. Antigravity is bold. And sometimes you have to stop holding the railing and try that weird escalator Google set up.
Here are the strongest arguments
In a scenario where you want to iterate quickly, build prototypes or remove bottlenecks Antigravity is often a better choice than VS Code.
Of course there are risks. Antigravity requires you to let go of some control. And developers let go of control about as willingly as they let go of their chair at the office. Agents can make mistakes, especially when instructions are vague. You are still the brain of the project even if the agents are the hands.
But despite that, it feels like the future is leaning towards a more AI-centered workflow. And Antigravity is far ahead here.
Antigravity is not just another “Google experiment.” It is a well-thought-out attempt to change the entire creative process behind programming. VS Code will not disappear but for the first time there is an IDE that spreads its wings and actually flies a little higher. The question is mostly how long you dare to stay grounded.
https://www.xda-developers.com/googles-antigravity-beats-vs-code
Google Antigravity är en AI-driven utvecklingsmiljö som bygger vidare på VS Code men med ett stort fokus på automatiserade AI-agenter. Det är som att få en IDE som både jobbar snabbare än du och ibland tittar konstigt på din lösning.
Agenterna arbetar parallellt och kan skapa kod, testa funktioner, refaktorera strukturer och till och med klicka runt i en webbläsare. Du berättar vad du vill ha, de försöker leverera, och du försöker låtsas att du fortfarande har kontroll.
Basfunktionerna är gratis, men vissa avancerade AI-funktioner kan ligga bakom konton eller betalnivåer. Google brukar ju gilla både molntjänster och inkomster, så överraskad blir nog ingen.
För vissa ja, för andra nej. Det beror på om du föredrar att arbeta traditionellt eller vill ha AI-agenter som bygger saker åt dig medan du dricker kaffe. Båda verktygen kan existera utan att starta världskrig, åtminstone än så länge.
Ja. Cursor fokuserar på att förbättra ditt flöde när du själv skriver kod. Antigravity däremot kan ta över större delar av processen tack vare sina agenter som kan springa iväg och göra testning, kodgenerering och strukturering åt dig. Lite som skillnaden mellan att få hjälp och att få ett helt outsourcing-team du inte betalar för.






